Comments on: Retro Rocket Paintings by Marianne Plumridge http://www.webomator.com/2008/03/14/retro-rocket-paintings-by-marianne-plumridge/ Swell News, Hype & Hyperbole from the Secret Laboratory at Webomator.com Tue, 06 Jan 2009 02:33:06 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1 By: Marianne http://www.webomator.com/2008/03/14/retro-rocket-paintings-by-marianne-plumridge/#comment-767 Marianne Sun, 16 Mar 2008 21:12:16 +0000 http://www.webomator.com/2008/03/14/retro-rocket-paintings-by-marianne-plumridge/#comment-767 Vanessa, Thanks for your expert input. It isn't a finely finished piece of art because it was completed in two VERY SHORT SITTINGS. Oh and by the way, the photo doesn't do the original any justice at all. The owner, who outbid two other people for this painting, loved it to death. Do you paint? :-D Cheers, Marianne Vanessa,
Thanks for your expert input. It isn’t a finely finished piece of art because it was completed in two VERY SHORT SITTINGS. Oh and by the way, the photo doesn’t do the original any justice at all. The owner, who outbid two other people for this painting, loved it to death. Do you paint? :-D

Cheers,
Marianne

]]> By: Bradley W. Schenck http://www.webomator.com/2008/03/14/retro-rocket-paintings-by-marianne-plumridge/#comment-752 Bradley W. Schenck Fri, 14 Mar 2008 21:13:53 +0000 http://www.webomator.com/2008/03/14/retro-rocket-paintings-by-marianne-plumridge/#comment-752 Well, like a friend of my mother's used to say, "It takes all kinds of flowers to make a garden". Well, like a friend of my mother’s used to say, “It takes all kinds of flowers to make a garden”.

]]> By: vanessa http://www.webomator.com/2008/03/14/retro-rocket-paintings-by-marianne-plumridge/#comment-751 vanessa Fri, 14 Mar 2008 21:07:09 +0000 http://www.webomator.com/2008/03/14/retro-rocket-paintings-by-marianne-plumridge/#comment-751 The painting is not that good.I feel that the rocket isnt painted that well, It should have been more clear . The painting is not that good.I feel that the rocket isnt painted that well, It should have been more clear .

]]>